Authority Engine provides clear, fact-based information on digital public relations. We commit to fairness and accuracy on every page of https://digitalprservices.agency/. This policy explains our editorial standards and processes.
Our Principles
Accuracy
We publish content that is correct, clear, and transparent. Our information relies on trusted sources, and we mark opinions clearly.
Accountability
We value our audience. We listen to feedback and correct errors quickly. We keep our editorial process open and honest.
Client Focus
We serve our clients by placing their interests first. Our work with industry experts ensures the content we create is relevant and precise.
Taste and Decency
We ensure our material suits a general audience. All content is free from offensive material.
Impartiality
We present information fairly. When opinions differ, we show all key perspectives and note any uncertainty.
Privacy
We protect personal data. We do not share personal information without clear consent unless required by law or the public interest.
Funding
Our work is funded internally. We do not accept corporate sponsorships or advertising that could influence our content.
Editorial Standards
Our team of editors upholds strict standards for accuracy and balance. All staff must report any conflicts of interest. We do not give special treatment to any partner organization.
Staff Training
We train all our editorial staff to meet these standards. Regular training ensures our content remains clear and reliable.
Editorial Process
Research
We base our content on proven methods and verified information. Our team gathers facts from industry experts, trusted research, and direct experience.
Production
A team member drafts the content. An editor reviews it for accuracy, clarity, tone, and balance. The website Editor checks for errors in facts, spelling, grammar, style, and presentation.
Policy Approval
Our Chief Executive Officer reviews and approves all content policies before they are published.
Content Review
We review major content once a year. Other material is reviewed at least every two years. User feedback is considered, and content is updated promptly when needed.
Appeals Procedure
If a complaint cannot be resolved by the editor, the matter is reviewed by our Chief Executive Officer.